“Skandal in Bohemia” (parti 25)

“Vo vis,”  Holmes observav, kuande noi pasuav a ulteriore e a siteriore, anteriore de dom, “ist matrimoni simplifik plu volontare aferi. Fotografad deveni arm dupl-bordik sitempe. Fortuiti es tal, ke ila eserio tale deinklinant da fakt, ke it eserio vised per Sinior Godfrey Norton, kuale nostr klient es deinklinant da fakt, ke it venierio a okuli de sie prinsa.
Sitempe kuestion es tal: “Keloke noi potes truvar fotografad?”

“Keloke, verase?”

“It es leplu neprobabl, ke ila port it sempre ko su. It av granditet portretik. Tro grand a okultar it fasile in vest de femin. Ila konos, ke Reg es kapabl a preparar atak neekspekted e shershar sie plas. Du tal provi av ya esed fasied. Ergo noi potes suposar, ke ila no port it ko su.”

“Ergo keloke?”

“Sie banker u sie advokat. Eksist ist posiblitet dupl. Ma mi es inklined a no pensar di ist du posibliteti. Femini es nature sekretos, e ilai am fasiar sue aferi sekretik propr. Kekause ila deberio inmanuar it a kelkun otr? Ila poteserio konfidar sue kustodasion propr, ma ila no poteserio dikar, kual influens nedirekt e politikal poteserio esar adported a presar su negosiant. Ekstr it, memoria, ke ila avav resolved a usar it durantu kelk diurni. It deb esar plas, keloke ila potes metar sue manui su it. It deb esar sie dom propr.”

Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://vokneutral.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/skandal-in-bohemia-parti-25/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: